Read This Before You Write Your University of Chicago Essays
If you’re searching for help on how to answer the University of Chicago essay prompts, make sure to read through this article in its entirety.
I’m not joking.
It’s too easy to disregard the University of Chicago essay prompts. This is certainly a death sentence. Well, more like a rejection sentence. If you want to write a good set of University of Chicago Essays, do NOT skip any parts of this guide.
I’ve curated this guide SPECIFICALLY because the University of Chicago Essay Prompts are not to be tackled the same way as prompts for other colleges. The essay prompts are about more than just being ‘quirky’.
If you follow my instructions very carefully, you WILL write a strong set of U Chicago essays.
Period.
Now, I’m going to ask you to take your student caps off and put on your marketing hats. That’s right, your marketing hats.
In this article, I’ll show you exactly how to do that. Let’s get started.
Table of Contents
- Writing a ‘Quirky’ U Chicago Essay
- University of Chicago Essay Prompt 1: Extended Essay Options
- What if the moon were made of cheese? Or Neptune made of soap? Pick a celestial object, reimagine its material composition, and explore the implications. Feel free to explore the realms of physics, philosophy, fantasy…the sky is the limit!
- What’s so easy about pie?
- In Homer’s Iliad, Helen had a “face that launched a thousand ships.” A millihelen, then, measures the beauty needed to launch one ship. The Sagan unit is used to denote any large quantity (in place of “billions and billions”). A New York Minute measures the period of time between a traffic light turning green and the cab behind you honking. Invent a new unit of measurement. How is it derived? How is it used? What are its equivalents?
- “There is no such thing as a new idea” – Mark Twain. Are any pieces of art, literature, philosophy, or technology truly original, or just a different combination of old ideas? Pick something, anything (besides yourself), and explain why it is, or is not, original.
- It’s said that history repeats itself. But what about other disciplines? Choose another field (chemistry, philosophy, etc.) and explain how it repeats itself. Explain how it repeats itself.
- In the spirit of adventurous inquiry (and with the encouragement of one of our current students!) choose one of our past prompts (or create a question of your own). Be original, creative, thought provoking. Draw on your best qualities as a writer, thinker, visionary, social critic, sage, citizen of the world, or future citizen of the University of Chicago; take a little risk, and have fun!
- University of Chicago Essay Prompt 2: Why U Chicago?
Writing a ‘Quirky’ U Chicago Essay
So, you’ve heard a lot about the infamous University of Chicago essay prompts asking their applicants to be cool and ‘quirky’. Before you get to that, you’ll need to drill this principle into your mind.
Ready? It’s a little ugly.
You are an asset.
Okay, that sounds a little bit cruel and objectifying. Regardless, it’s the truth.
The University of Chicago essay prompts is a screening process that determines how much value you could add to the school. A quirky college essay that is both creative and interesting shows you have the cultural fit needed to succeed in school.
Be careful, though. It’s possible to write a quirky U Chicago essay that doesn’t demonstrate your value or worth to the school. This can happen if you’re too focused on writing something interesting or unique without also showing your worth as a candidate. Now, that doesn’t mean don’t show your creative color at all. Have a balance between both practicality and creativity.
Make sure whenever you’re trying to write a creative and quirky U Chicago essay that you also ask yourself this: “How does my essay show to the admissions officers that I’m someone who is worth accepting into the university? How can I contribute to the school, and how does the community benefit from my attendance?”
Oh, and even if you’re applying for a STEM field, you’ll still need to demonstrate strong writing ability. There’s no escape!
With that said, let’s get on to how to write the U Chicago essays for prompts 1 and 2.
University of Chicago Essay Prompt 1: Extended Essay Options
What if the moon were made of cheese? Or Neptune made of soap? Pick a celestial object, reimagine its material composition, and explore the implications. Feel free to explore the realms of physics, philosophy, fantasy…the sky is the limit!
Remember: as creative and quirky you want to be in the University of Chicago celestial object essay, one thing is clear:
It should say something about you.
That is, the admissions officers should be able to deconstruct your essay to understand what kind of person you are. Your character trait should also be something that helps the admissions officers know whether you’re a great fit.
So, if you write about Neptune being made of chocolate, but there is no direct correlation between chocolate and your identity, it may not be a strong fit for your role.
Okay, how about you –as a Biology major– write about the Sun as a massive ball of bacteria? That would make more sense; however, it would probably lack the creativity and unique quality needed for the University of Chicago to be interested.
Now, let’s say stars were not made of Helium. Imagine you’re a philosophy major. This can actually make for a creative U Chicago essay. The conversion of Hydrogen into Helium creates heat which makes stars bright. Thus, a lack of helium would prevent stars from shining. From a philosophical standpoint, you may say this would be a devastating thing to humanity. It would give human civilization nothing to look up to, and they would ultimately be lost in chaos with no archetypal symbol to act as their God.
Here’s an example of this topic in the University of Chicago essay for prompt 2.
If Stars Didn’t Twinkle
“Hydrogen –> Helium = Hope. Except, not really.
More specifically, Hydrogen –> Helium = the heat that gives stars its light. Without Helium, though, said stars would never shine bright.
So, what’s so bad about stars if they don’t twinkle?
Firstly, we would no longer have the stars to navigate the seas. What good is humanity if it were stuck in its own continent, unable to brave the unknown? This problem is deeper than just geographical exploration, though. It’s spiritual. We would no longer have any guidance in the night.
Those stars we so take for granted pierce the darkness in perfect light. They illuminate the Earth with what little light they reflect, such that we may have a hope of survival when the sun sets. Without them, we would still cower in fear before predatory snakes and giant nocturnal cats. The dark would then be something to be feared, and not conquered.
Then, it gets worse.
The lack of helium in stars, thus the lack of light in them, would break our spiritual and religious presuppositions.
Our ancient ancestors relied on the stars to proejct their beliefs. It shaped their way of life, and their moral philosophy. The stars were their Gods; more than that, though, the stars served as an abstract higher being with which the ancient peoples could look up to. They were metaphors for the higher order. “Reach for the stars” and some variation of that saying is what kept us from stagnating across time.
Without it, we would have a Nietzschean death of God.
Anyone can do this. Anyone! Simply look up at the sky at night and stare at the stars. If there’s no light pollution, it’ll be impossible to see the millions of speckled lights scattered across the sky’s canvas without spiritual awe. That spiritual awe grips us and puts us in a trance. It makes us contemplate our existence, and more so, inspires us to strive for a higher purpose than hunting rabbits and hiding from big cats.
To look up at the sky in awe at the stars is to dream. That’s where all the great ideas that built civilization came from: 2:00 AM walks around the house when everyone’s asleep, thinking about that incredible idea you’ve come up with that would change the world.
Without the stars and their twinkle, without the bright light which guides us when times are darkest, without something beautiful to look up to in inspiration and spiritual awe, we would fail to strive for anything greater. We would, fail to become human.
As an aspiring philosophy major, I would like to attend the University of Chicago to preserve exactly that: the stars we so take for granted. Ever since the Nietzschean death of God that crippled the collective unconscious, I’ve been fascinated by the societal efforts to preserve it. I’ve seen my own community lose the helium to their stars. Their stars no longer twinkle, and they thus become consumed by disorder and hopelessness.
Should I attend the University of Chicago, I would like to restore that Helium. I will use what I learn in Philosophy to bring back the light my community lost.”
University of Chicago Essay Prompt 2 Example Essay, Celestial Object
Let’s circle back to what we said in the beginning.
When answering all of the University of Chicago essay prompts, you need to demonstrate worth. This one is no exception.
Not only do you show a creative way of going into the topic of Philosophy as our major, but it is clear from this topic that you are a candidate concerned for the good of your community. You have an empathetic personality that cares for society, but you also value the part of human nature that can be inspired by beauty and awe. It also shows you’re someone who values looking into the future, as the topic of looking up as inspiration subtly implies this.
What’s so easy about pie?
Yeah, okay. The “What’s so easy about pie?” U Chicago essay isn’t particularly easy to understand at first glance.
That’s okay, though! The U Chicago pie prompt was written that way on purpose! Because it asks such an arbitrary yet limiting question, it truly challenges your creativity. This question essentially asks you to prove yourself to the admissions office.
To answer the easy-as-pie prompt, let’s dissect the terms. That means we’ll need to define all the possibilities each important word in the prompt means.
When they ask us, “what’s so easy about pie?” we need to define the following:
- Easy
- Pie
Firstly, what exactly do we mean by easy?
Easy in our modern usage can mean any of the following:
- A derogatroy term to describe someone who is sexually available.
- A way of describing a task as low in difficulty.
- Beautiful or physically attractive. Example: “easy on the eyes”
- A command to tell someone to calm down. Example: “Easy there, fellow!”
Now, what do we mean by pie?
Here are a few variations.
- The word “pie” in and of itself. As in, the word and not the meaning attached to the word.
- The different version of “easy as cake”.
- Pies of different variations such as apple or cherry instead of just pies in general.
- Pie as a chart in statistics and business.
The most important thing about answering this University of Chicago essay prompt is to avoid being cliché. So, how do you know your essay topic is something special and no one else has written it? Generally speaking, it’s quite difficult. Without advice from an admissions expert, it can be pretty hard to figure out if you’re writing a cliché essay topic or not. If you don’t know whether it’s a cliché topic, try measuring how quickly it took for you to come up with the topic. You can also imagine how complex the mental path would be for someone to have a similar answer to you.
For instance, it’s not hard to come up with a different pie by talking about the Mathematical pi of 3.14. So, don’t talk about that one.
To avoid wasting time on a cliché topic, we would recommend speaking with us for a free consultation! You can get help with answering the University of Chicago essay prompts within 24 hours.
And, as always, remember to show your strong characteristics as a potential student.
Let’s take a look at an example that would not be so cliché.
Tricky Math
“There’s something scary about Math.
Not the “I don’t like when they add numbers and letters together in Algebra” sort of way, but its connection with Psychology in particualr. Specifically, I’m talking about statistics. Even more specfically, pies.
These are no ordinary pies, but pie charts. There’s nothing too hard about them. They inform us about percentages and distributions. The scary part is the soft insinuation behind all of them.
When I was in my Sophomore year of high school, my friends and I developed Study Strat –an online software product using Big 5 personality test results to develop a custom work and study schedule around a student’s Google Calendar events. High in trait Neuroticism? Here’s how to study and how often without getting mentally strained. Low in Conscientiousness? Here are daily exercises to help you cope with low motivation throughout busy work weeks.
When I let my students in my tutoring sessions take the program for free, I immediately saw they improved both their academic performance and stress levels. I was convinced that the results will just “speak for itself” and that every parent and teacher would be begging to purchase such a product. Marketing it, though, was dreadful.
“If you build a great product, the product will sell itself.”
That’s what we thought. That is, until we tried to sell the product. In the offchance we were lucky enough that people would even listen to our proposals, the conversations went something like this.
“So, what is it?”
“It’s a program that tests your Big 5 personality traits to create a custom-made…”
“Big 5? What’s that? You mean, like, the sports store?”
“No… it’s…”
Marketing was our worst nightmare. At the end of the year, only six people actually decided to purchase the product. Five of them were very satisfied and one person bought the product but never responded to us about what they thought about it. Eventually, we wanted to try marketing the product to a for-profit tutoring center. Miraculously, we had a date and time reserved to discuss the product with the manager further. During our planning phase prior to the meeting, my friends and I came together to discuss how to introduce the product in a manner that doesn’t look so new and untested. Afterall, we only had 6 customers.
Our lead software developer said, “I know. Here. It’s a pie chart.”
A small sliver of our customers felt neutral or had no comment about our product. The rest of the 5/6 were ecstatic!
We obviously couldn’t stick with that proposition –it was too immoral, and felt too close to a lie depsite how true it was.
That’s what makes pies so easy: they’re the best at manipulating people into thinking something is more serious than it actually is. That’s not all, though.
As an aspiring entrepenuer looking to get into the online SaaS marketing world, I was stunned and surprised with how many seemingly smart and impressive people there were. At some point in my journey, I began to notice just how easy it was for people to sneakily misrepresent their statistics. They’d say that 80% of their clients were satisfied with an absurdly arrogant pie chart boasting a large slice to represent the 80%, and the other 20 percent just slightly outside the pie. Then, through more digging, one would find that they only really truly had about 5 cleints, four of which were satisfied.
The other thing about pie charts is just how simplistic their design is. It’s just a circle with lines through them. Yet, they so easily manipulate a reader into following a certain belief. It’s easy to make the pie, easy to see the pie, and easy to fall for the pie.
Despite my entrepreneurial temperament, I’m in some ways still a Math person at heart. I love the real numbers: the ones that don’t lie, or paint an unreal picture. It’s motivated me to take a statistical approach to my business temperament, and not try to trick people the way statsitcs usually can. I like to think I’m taking a more ethical approach to my own marketing.
Nonethelss, despite pies being so easy for manipulation, despite my persistence not to use them in my own business, I know when the business opportunities arise that I will still jump at them to take a slice.“
University of Chicago Essay Prompt 2 Example Essay, Easy Pie
This essay example has a unique take on both “pie” and “easy”. “Pie” refers to the pie charts used by marketers to show the distributions of customer statistics in a favorable light. “Easy” refers to how simple it is to trick others into thinking numbers are bigger than they really are.
The essay also shows the admissions officers more of the values the student has. As a future application for the University of Chicago, the applicant writes that they are someone both with a hard-working business mindset and an ethical one. They also end the essay showing that despite their ethical restrictions, it doesn’t mean they won’t jump at the opportunity to “take a slice” or monetize the next big thing. That is, they’re not passive.
In Homer’s Iliad, Helen had a “face that launched a thousand ships.” A millihelen, then, measures the beauty needed to launch one ship. The Sagan unit is used to denote any large quantity (in place of “billions and billions”). A New York Minute measures the period of time between a traffic light turning green and the cab behind you honking. Invent a new unit of measurement. How is it derived? How is it used? What are its equivalents?
Okay, this one can be a bit tricky.
However, let’s keep this in mind. Demonstrate worth to the admissions officers. They want to know that you’re someone who will be worthy of attending the University of Chicago.
You can measure anything, but choosing any one measurement may not fully show your worth to the school.
If you write about the time it takes for someone to scroll past an Instagram post, it may segway into topics like social media marketing, boredom, and the ability to retain attention. This may make for an interesting essay; however, it’s difficult to funnel this into something that shows the admissions officers something great about you as a candidate.
Now, let’s talk about the reps you do during a workout when you are tired.
There are reps you do at the beginning of a workout, and there are “those” ones. We all know them: the ones that occur when you are right about to hit the towel and call it a day. They’re the ones you don’t want to do, but you also want to do to put out a few “final reps” despite your arms and abs feeling like they’re on fire. Talking about one unit of measurement of “those reps” can show the admissions officers that you have the drive to get through obstacles. It shows grit and determination are major factors in your identity and being.
Let’s see the workout topic in action.
The Warrior Rep
“There’s something weird about the human body.
Well, okay. There’s a lot that’s weird. We sometimes get sleep paralysis demons visitng us too.
Though, there are more monsters in our bodies than just the made-up one that sits on the corners of our bed. There’s us. Or, more specifically, the one that lays dormant inside of us waiting to come out. This demon comes out through strenuous physical activity. That doesn’t mean put dumbells and protein shakes into a pentagram. Instead, the ritual goes like this: put pressure on your body until you feel like you physically are no longer capable. Then, something magical happens.
The reps no longer feel painful. It’s weird, but you get a sudden burst of energy as if you were posessed by a powerful monster of immense strength. It wakes up inside you, and suddenly the pain disappears –it is replaced with strength.
One, two, three… thirthy-nine, forty….
Suddenly, dumbbell curls after forty reps won’t hurt anymore. Your arms won’t feel in pain, but you’ll have a newfound strength to do more.
Dumbbell curl number Forty-one and forty-two, thus, become something special.
They’re called Warrior Reps, because you need to fight for them.
In short, the Warrior Rep is the length of workout you go past your preconceived limit. If you are doing squats at the gym, the squats you do past the limit you oringinially thought you had are the Warrior Reps. The number of steps you’ve taken on a climbing mill past the physical limit you tell yourself you’ll stop at is a Warrior Rep. You can tell when your workout has a warrior rep when your workout seemingly transcends the part of your brain that tells you, “Why bother with the pain? Why not just go home?” You’ve done a warrior rep when you push out one more repitition during your exercise when your limbs are burning and you can feel your teeth clench in defiance.
They don’t have to be limited to the gym too. After all, not everyone can afford a gym. Warrior reps are also performed by those you see in the park running track. There’s always that one person. They’re the center of attention. The couple flirting under a tree, the aunties doing Tai Chi with the music blaring, the high school students training for Cross Country, they all know who is doing Warrior Reps.
It’s the person gasping for dear life whilst running laps.
He’s too tired to care abour proper running form. The back of his shirt is a puddle. There’s a fire burning in his heart that’s hotter than the fire in his lungs.
There’s only one thing a Warrior Rep can be used, though. It is used as a sobering reminder.
The Warrior Rep is used to remind ourselves of the frailty of the mind. It helps us remember the rationalizations we often make to get away with avoiding the painful responsibilities we know we must endure. To count your Warrior Reps is to remember just how powerful and capable the human body is. If the human body is capable of making at least one Warrior Rep, we have no excuses to succumb to our laziness and instant gratification.
Throughout my academic and personal career, I’ve counted my Warrior Reps. I’ve measured exactly how many times I can go further than my presupposed limits, and seen just how far they truly can go. Not only have I lifted heavier objects more often and swam more laps, but I also spent more hours studying than I thought I could tolerate. I listened for more minutes during conversations before interrupting a conversation. I did 2 acts of kindness a day instead of one.
If I had to invent a unit of measurement, every burning muscle fiber of my being would scream that the Warrior Rep is the one to invent. To conquer that which is seemingly inconquerable –it’s the most valuable thing to measure!”
University of Chicago Essay Prompt 2 Example Essay, Unit of Measurement
Okay, now let’s deconstruct what makes this a good U Chicago unit of measurement essay.
Notice how the Warrior Rep is something that shows the applicant’s interest in physical health? It also shows that it is a value of hard work and dedication past rationalization. What also works well here is the fact that the essay expands the Warrior Rep into everyday life. It shows that it can count for seconds past tolerance in any field, and not just in exercise. This shows the admissions officers that the applicant can translate their values into multiple parts of life.
“There is no such thing as a new idea” – Mark Twain. Are any pieces of art, literature, philosophy, or technology truly original, or just a different combination of old ideas? Pick something, anything (besides yourself), and explain why it is, or is not, original.
When considering what exactly you want to talk about, whether it would be literature, art, philosophy, or technology, consider choosing a topic that would later funnel into your major of focus.
That does NOT mean to talk exactly about the major. That makes the admissions essay too obvious and takes away some of the creative inspiration in your story. For instance, talking about a truly original piece of literature, then concluding with how you want to major in English may not be the most special idea. It makes the essay predictable, and it doesn’t give your essay the quirky and unique flare needed to stand out in the U Chicago admissions process.
Consider trying to go one direction, but make it a surprise with what you’ll eventually reveal to be your major.
In addition, don’t get lost in trying too hard to answer the question. You can easily get lost. At the end of the day, remember to make sure your essay shows the admissions officers what sort of person you are.
The Rarest Pepe
“In the depths of the “dark web” lurk strange alt-right forums, illegal activity, and, in some strange manner, humour that seems to transcend basic understanding.
Specifically, there is a running joke in alt-right forums known as Rare Pepes. These are online photos of a frog that are considered unique in design and artistic creation. Some, depending on how unique in character the drawing is, are considered more “rare” than others. In other words, they work like card games.
I was reading up on strange alt-right humor and soon found myself in a rabbit hole of the Rare Pepe trend. It led me to more of the history such as where the frog came from and why it was associated with alt-right fanbases. Then, I found something interesting.
Someone in a forum posted a method of creating what they called the “Rarest Pepe”
This would, theoretically, be a drawing of the frog that is truly original in that no one could have possibly created it. That is, it can exist without having been created by another person. Here is how to make it.
1. step one: become intoxicated. Drink however much alcohol it takes to be inebriated without passing out.
2. step two: pull out a sheet of paper and pen.
3. step three: draw Pepe the Frog in your inebriated state.
4. step four: fold the paper into a small square.
5. step five: dig a hole and bury the drawing in it.
The result is a piece of artwork that is completely original. No one had willed it into existence, as the artist was inebriated upon creating it. No one can discover it either since it is buried –unless it were randomly dug up.
Okay, so this doesn’t actually work. The piece of art would not be able to be original because it still was influenced by Pepe the Frog, the comic character made by Matt Furie. Any piece of art created, whether through sobriety or inebriation, would technically be traced back to some older idea. This path of creating the “Rarest Pepe” had me thinking, though: is it possible to truly create a peice of art that is completely original?
And, after long nights of thinking about the Pepe problem, I belive I’ve figured out a solution. This is how one could make a compeltely original piece of art, untainted by the combination of old ideas.
1. step one: have billions of canvases and buckets of paint prepared.
2. step two: make one stroke on each painting.
3. step three: statistically, at some point, Quantum Tunneling should allow the holes between atoms to pass through the holes between the atoms of the canvas. This allows your brush to pass right through.
4. step four: you may have intended to create a painting consisting of one brush stroke, but you’ve made a blank white canvas with a splatter of paint all over from the ensuing paintbrush dropping through the canvas. Thus, the new painting is something not related to your vision since you didn’t intend to create it. Also, it is something no one has ever done before.
Horray! A completely new and unique work of art that no one had ever created, untouched by the previous influences of others, is made! Except, it hasn’t been done yet. I also have my doubts that I can ask any university if they would have the funds to create billions of canvases and buckets of paint.
However, the only reason I fell down the rabbit hole of Rare Pepes and their strange culture was becasue I always had an interest in paradoxes and Mathematical phenomenon to begin with. If we had an absurd amount of monkeys randomly bashing on a keyboard, would one at some point write the entirety of Shakespeare’s works? It’s quite interesting an idea to humour, but I don’t think I would be investing in monkeys any time soon.
Instead, I would like to dedicate my time at the University of Chicago finding a solution to the originality problem. I’ve experimented for the past two years with machine learning and artificial intellgience to create paintings that are truly unique in design.
In short, I do believe there exists a piece of art that is completely unique and untouched by previous ideas. However, it just doesn’t quite exist yet. I would certainly like to contribute to that future creation. For the pluripotentiality of unique creations, I may not be too interested in creating the “rarest” hate symbol. However, I would still like to pursue machine learning as a means of revolutionizing originality in art.”
University of Chicago Essay Prompt 2 Example Essay, New and Original Idea
This essay works because it does two things correctly.
First, it’s more subtle with what it wants to talk about as its main point. Although we can see the essay refers to making an art piece original, the subject takes a more unexpected turn and leads us to computer science and machine learning.
Second, the essay also subtly shows the applicant’s willingness to pursue learning. The essay shows the applicant’s mental process of moving from one rabbit hole into a completely new one. They jump from deconstructing and analyzing online forums, to creating art that is unique, to creating unique art via technology. The essay doesn’t have to directly say it, but it shows that the applicant has a will to learn more and adapt to different topics when called for.
It’s said that history repeats itself. But what about other disciplines? Choose another field (chemistry, philosophy, etc.) and explain how it repeats itself. Explain how it repeats itself.
For this topic, just like in the last one, it is clear that you want to choose a topic that is going to be related to your future major of choice at the University of Chicago.
This question is also a good test of your knowledge and deeper understanding of your field. Most of every subject has a repetitive pattern that exists in it if you look deep enough. If you can pinpoint a repetitive pattern in the subject of your choice, you can show the admissions officers how well you understand the material.
Remember to try to fit in your character and values in the essay. It helps the admissions officers make a better analysis of your fit to the school. You can see how we’ve done that in this example essay below.
Tiger Parent
“There existed a time when, if someone were “possessed by demons” you would “cure” them by burning them at a stake.
In the modern day, we like to keep the flammables away –and for good reason. In modern day California, where I live, more fires are likely not welcome. However, my hometown in California, Arcadia, is a hotspot for a different kind of possession. It’s a kind of posession that involves less exorcisms and ghosts, but still involves being controlled. This posession makes people controlled by an ideolgoy.
The posession I’m talking about is traditional tiger parenting.
These practices stemmed from many different cultures. Chinese Confucianism, Catholicism, and Christianity were all major tenets that contributed to this way of parenting.
Tiger parenting differs in every household, but the most common involve extreme and unrealistic expectations of children and borderline physical and verbal abuse aimed at them. The posession part of tiger parenting is terrifying to say the least. In broad brush strokes, it works something like this.
“There isn’t a thing you can say that will convince me to change the way I parent my children. It doesn’t matter what research and authority you throw at me. I’m not going to budge.”
Where I’m from, this mindset is most prominent in immigrant families with first-generation children. The children more often than not live under the thumb of their parents and their tiger parenting practices. This physical and verbal abuse is so commonly widespread in the community that the children often grow up without autonomy. It’s not just my community in Arcadia that is posessed by delusional ideas of tiger parenting. It’s around the globe.
This worldwide posession of tiger parenting seems unmoving. No amount of science or theory can sway the opinions of tiger parents.
Thus, we reach a repetitive state. The world of child development and education is consistently repetitive. No matter the statistics debunking the efficacy of tiger parenting, no matter the facts, no matter the logic, there does not seem to be any way science can sway modern parents away from their ideological behaviors. I’ve worked with a parenting training program hosted in my local lobrary as an intern. The program was educational; it aimed to teach parents the right way of teaching children. This involved not spanking children, using words of encouragement, and avoiding abusive language.
I’ve seen how these seminars and workshops were carelessly denigrated. There was every excuse under the Sun thrown at the lecturers about why people should still be allowed to spank their children or speak to them however they please. Personal freedom, parenting “style”, cultural differences, and many more were all thrown about.
Child development psychology, no matter its sophistication, will not change the tiger parenting mind. All it takes is one word. “No.”
Thus, the field will consistenly repeat itself. It will come up with new ways of teaching and raising kids, but little will change. A basic rule of thumb in therapy is quite similar: people will not change unless they want to.
At the University of Chicago, I would like to end the cycle of repetitive child development research falling on deaf ears. There is great importance in research and uncovering the truth, but equally as important is the belief and utility of said truth. By taking a sociological stance that cross-disciplines child psychology, I hope to bring an end to the destructive and repetitive nature of the field. Through attending the University of Chicago, I may have hope of helping the research child developement psychologists worked so hard for, at last, become accepted. I would not only help the field, but the future generation of immigrant children so often affected by tiger parenting.”
University of Chicago Essay Propmt 2 Essay Example; Tiger Parent
This essay works because it makes it very clear what exactly the student is going to major in. We are introduced to a bit of the student’s background information and early life. However, it transitions into the main topic: the repetitive fate of child development research due to its content falling on deaf ears.
It’s a strong essay because it also shows the applicant’s values and beliefs. The applicant clearly has a strong empathetic streak. They chose a topic that focuses on the betterment of children and their upbringing. Also, they have a more scientific approach to parenting that isn’t afraid to rupture the status quo of his community. They are willing to disagree with a majority population of tiger parenting if it meant the betterment of child development.
Therefore, this essay is also brave. It shows the admissions officers that the applicant will be willing to make sacrifices for the greater good, even if it means social disagreement.
In the spirit of adventurous inquiry (and with the encouragement of one of our current students!) choose one of our past prompts (or create a question of your own). Be original, creative, thought provoking. Draw on your best qualities as a writer, thinker, visionary, social critic, sage, citizen of the world, or future citizen of the University of Chicago; take a little risk, and have fun!
For obvious reasons, this question requires you to state the past prompt or the question you’ve created on your own. Preferably, you would put the prompt you’re answering at the beginning of your University of Chicago essay. This makes it less confusing for the admissions officers when they begin reading.
When coming up with a topic for this University of Chicago original essay question, you should consider opening yourself up a little bit. They already know your major and most of your academic future because of that. Thus, this essay is truly an opportunity for you to open up about yourself and your ideas or your significant experiences.
We would recommend thinking about something that you deeply identify with. Are you someone who is spiritual? Are you a “literary” person who appreciates ideas in the written form? Are you someone who associates with a certain demographic because it played a very significant role in your life?
Think about all of these things. Then, consider what you would do to show more of your character. The more of your personality you show the admissions officers, the better chance they have of using it to give you more reasons to get accepted.
Demeter’s Osteoporosis
What is the most life-changing revelation you’ve ever encountered and how did it shape the person you are today?
What I want to share is something quite personal. I do not think of myself as a “profound dreamer”. I’ve often only had dreams of being in dirty bathrooms, having my teeth fall out, or falling from the sky: very common dreams.
In fact, I don’t believe I ever liked interpreting dreams to begin with. I do not know the reason, but it may be because I found dream descriptions too convenient or vague; it was like reading something enlightening yet completely useless at the same time.
That all changed, though, when I had my frist genuinely profound dream 6 months ago.
I was driving down a freeway that never seemed to end. The road had become mostly a desert, and what little infastrcutre was left was mostly devoured by sand.
In the distance was a turn. There were a phalanx of Roman centurian screaming for help. I was, strangely enough, a spectator of myself in this dream. I watched myself drive past them, completely ignoring their calls. Then, the road became even more wild and uncivilized. Cracks and potholes formed all about, and the desert around me merged with the pavement. I stopped my car at what appeared to be one last exit. This exit was covered in wire fence and green fabrics, blocking off the path.
I watched myself park in front of the fence, scale up the fence, and swing over it. I was effectively in the other side. There, I saw three strange things in front of me: the remnants of Hong Kong in the distance, foliage and greenery slowly approaching from all sides, and a fog.
In the left side of me was a particularly stark patch of green. There was an abandoned mansion with a rusted gate featuring Egyptian heiroglyphics. Through the gate, a lively river was flowing downsteam. I followed the river downstream, where the trees grew thicker and Hong Kong could just be seen from afar. The fog started to thin out, and the setting resembled more of a forest with very step downstream. However, the strength and volume of water in the river decreased over time. Every elevation we I went down, the water started to become more green and thin.
Eventually, after an eternity of walking, the stream halted into a trickle. What used to be clear and rapid white water stalled into a small venomous green fluid. It seemed to cut through the vines and trees, and run only on the rocks. The rocks all led the eye, and what was left of the poisonous creek at that, to a small metal plaque with a golden frame carved on a large stone. On it, the fossil of a large prehistoric bird lay flat with its wings spread. The creek’s poisonous content had dripped onto the plaque, making the small-print description illegible. However, the title was clear.
Demeter’s Osteoporosis.
What I felt upon reading those words could only be described as an earth-shattering awareness of my own existence. At the time, I did not even remember which Greek God Demeter was. I didn’t even know what the word Osteoporosis meant. All I felt was a sudden self-awareness of my own being, how profound it was that I was alive.
When I woke up from the dream, I knew it wasn’t like any other experience I’ve ever had. I researched what the words meant, learning that Demeter was the Goddess of agriculture and harvest; she also punished the mortal world with winter upon discovering her daughter’s kidnapping by Hades. Osteporosis on the other hand meant the deterioration of the bones.
It’s one of the few dreams I’ve actually taken the time to psychoanalyze and truly deconstruct. It was such a profound yet indescribable feeling, but I believe I’ve found the meaning behind my dream and what my unconscious mind was trying to tell me. Throughout the early years of my academic career, I never truly had people who I could consider positive male role models. Many of the men in my life, whether it was my tyrannical father, my spoilt brothers, or men with the audacity to catcall me in the street, left a bad impression on my mind of men as a whole. I developed a negative relationship with men, and could hardly introduce any positive masculine energy in my life. During my family’s divorce, I felt detached from my mother and father. Strangely enough, I entered a “phase” trying to search for an identity through uncovering my cultural roots. Despite not feeling like I had any reason to, I felt that my identity after that had been fragmented and scattered. In some ways, I wasn’t “whole.”
This is what I believe my dream tried to tell me.
I believe my dream was trying to tell me that I was unconsicously in search of “wholeness.” The most masculine people I could imagine are Roman centurians, and I may have associated them and my ignoring them with my complete apostatization of any positive masculine energy in my life. Since my family used to live in Hong Kong, I believe my dreaming about entering the blocked off exit to reach it was my unconscious mind’s way of telling me that I was looking at my culture for wholeness. I was searching the Asian culture that I so readily abdicated when I was young. Without masculine energy in my life, and without any faith in its return, I was searching for a spiritual wholeness to replace it. When following the stream and seeing the healthy water turn to a trickling poison that destroyed the plaque of Demeter, It may have been a representation of the inevitable doom that would await me: if I continued to search into my soul until I reached the bottom, all I would find is the death of the poviding and caring part of my motherly side.
In short, what awaits me at the end of my resentful rage against all of masculinity is inevitably the death of the kind and caring motherly side that provides and brings harvest.
This analysis seemed barely accurate, yet very much so at the same time. Firstly, I’m not even a mother and I don’t control harvesting productivity with magic. Though, from a psychoanalytical perspective, I’ve very much seen my lack of faith in men as a whole begin to chip away at the “kind and loving” side of myself. I began to notice just how much my resentment and anger for men made me cynical; it didn’t allow for any more space to be a forgiving person.
The death of the masculine should not be the death of Demeter. Or, at least, I must not allow it to be that way. I must preserve the positive femininity in my life without letting the death of positive masculinity sow chaos into my life. Thus, I’ve decided to put on a more hopeful approach to my modern fight against patriarchal oppression. The postive masculine that should empower us is dead, and the modern patriarchy has taken its place.
I, however, am learning to fight against it with careful consideration for the positive feminine aspect. I cannot lose the mercy and willingness to provide, that aspect that keeps us close to Demeter.
University of Chicago Essay Propmt 2 Essay Example; Demeter’s Osteoporosis
This essay example is strong because it is using a much more personal experience to open up to the admissions officers. This demonstrates a level of seriousness and dedication to the school, but it also shows the applicant is not afraid of looking into the more personal parts of their lives to show creativity.
People often do not carelessly share their dreams, as they can be as archetypal and symbolic as they are weird and embarrassing.
Another strong part of this essay is the end. It shows the admissions officers that the student has incorporated the values they’ve learned from the dream into their modern-day morals. Despite being a woman who opposes the patriarchy, she also shows she treads carefully. Her reflections on her dreams allowed her to see that she should not be using her lack of faith in masculinity to corrupt or denigrate the positive feminine side in her.
University of Chicago Essay Prompt 2: Why U Chicago?
How does the University of Chicago, as you know it now, satisfy your desire for a particular kind of learning, community, and future? Please address with some specificity your own wishes and how they relate to U Chicago.
You will need to know how to write the U Chicago “Why Us” essay well. It plays a major role in the admissions process. More importantly, this essay question format makes it especially important.
Think back to what we said at the beginning of our article: “you are an asset.”
The admissions office uses the essays as a screening tool to determine both your fit and the benefit of accepting someone like you into their school. That is, why should a school like U Chicago bother investing time and money in educating you?
This question inexorably ties you with this conclusion: that the U Chicago “Why Us” essay is simultaneously a question asking why you should attend their school and why they can benefit from your attending there.
Let’s also deconstruct a few other things about the prompt.
- How does the University of Chicago satisfy your learning?
- How does the University of Chicago satisfy your community?
- How does the University of Chicago satisfy your future?
- Address your own wishes and its relation to the University of Chicago.
Notice how the prompt doesn’t present you with an “or”? You’ll need a mixture of all four of these elements. They don’t have to all be fleshed out in many words; after all, you’ll be stretching out your word count. However, don’t forget that you need to answer the University of Chicago essay prompts directly.
The admissions officers like an interesting essay, but it’s also important that you deliver what they ask for. It shows you can follow basic instructions.
In terms of how the school can help you with learning, think about what that word means to you. Remember: you can learn a lot at any school you attend. Just hole up in their library a few hours a day, and you’ll be smarter than you ever thought you could be. Thus, there has to be something about the University of Chicago and its learning experience that is unique to you. Maybe learning is about the personable experiences you can create in a diverse community that upholds the virtue of unique thought and originality. The school certainly holds unique and creative personalities in high regard (just look at the essay prompts.) Or, you think learning involves a deeper and more personal understanding of the liberal arts that will help you feel more fulfilled in life. You may think that the University of Chicago is a place to learn more about the liberal arts more than the surface level that most schools provide.
Now, let’s talk about community. The admissions officers want to know how their school satisfies your need for a specific sort of community. In other words, the University of Chicago “Why Us” essay is also asking you what makes the school your home. For some people, that may be because the school is the complete opposite of the slow and quiet town they live in. It may be the place deep in the city that calls to their soul because it is a place where they can, for once, seek a true challenge in the liberal arts. You may even say that the University of Chicago satisfies your desire for the right community because it is literally filled with the sorts of people who you loved yet never knew in your life: creative, conscientious, and artistic. Maybe you lived in an area in Los Angeles where a lot of artists simply did not care about working hard for their creative pursuits; they were only concerned with the status that came with art. Thus, your true home as an artist would be in U Chicago: where the liberal arts truly thrive and intermingles with strong conscientiousness.
Next, we have the future. The University of Chicago essay prompts also subtly want to know how the school satisfies your future. In fact, not many people in high school or college even know what they want to do in the future for certain! In this question, you need to at least have a certain level of your future partially fleshed out. The University of Chicago would not look fondly to people who have not had a single thought put into the future at all! You don’t have to know what you want to do, but at least know to a certain degree what you would be interested in. I would suggest the following exercise. Use an elimination approach.
- What careers do I know I cannot do in the future? (Example: can’t do surgery because you can’t stand the sight of blood)
- What careers do I know I would have a talent for? (I don’t get angry easily and I like to please people, so the Human Resources industry fits me well.)
- What careers fit my temperament and personality makeup? If you’re not too sure, you can take a test to measure your personality here.
Lastly, you want to address how your wishes can help the University of Chicago. If you have a deep interest in the liberal arts, particularly in English, maybe your goals will indirectly help the students and community at the University of Chicago. For example, let’s say that you’re majoring in English. The school is most known for fields like Social Sciences, Biological Medicine, and Public Administration. Interestingly enough, despite the high barrier of entry in intelligence for these fields, most people still perform at or below average in verbal and reading comprehension skills.
Let’s say you started a startup helping students of STEM fields catch up on their English skills.
You can be a great asset to the University of Chicago by championing one of its deep educational values: the importance of English literacy, regardless of field. Your startup will make a great fit for the school since it has high-performing students in STEM, but your startup also aligns with the school’s principles.
If you are still struggling with answering the University of Chicago essay prompts, we would highly recommend speaking with an admissions essay editing expert. You can contact us for a free consultation. We will get back to you within 24 hours.